1995-11-01 - Re: “Dr.” Fred

Header Data

From: shields@tembel.org (Michael Shields)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: b4bc7815d29e7d9050291d8f139f160af743689eabe478f1b655a824c6c9f719
Message ID: <478lic$vv@yage.tembel.org>
Reply To: <199511010235.DAA00908@utopia.hacktic.nl>
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-01 23:42:17 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 2 Nov 1995 07:42:17 +0800

Raw message

From: shields@tembel.org (Michael Shields)
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 1995 07:42:17 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: "Dr." Fred
In-Reply-To: <199511010235.DAA00908@utopia.hacktic.nl>
Message-ID: <478lic$vv@yage.tembel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


In article <199511010235.DAA00908@utopia.hacktic.nl>,
Anonymous <anon-remailer@utopia.hacktic.nl> wrote:
> The difference, of course, is that its almost impossible
> to have sympathy for Dr. Fred. His hustle is for a hell
> of a lot more than subsistence. He was also never actually
> a master of his field, a fact that becomes increasingly
> obvious as our exposure to him goes on. Now he's reduced
> himself to trying to collect someone else's winnings.

So, what part of your analogy was valid?
-- 
Shields.





Thread