1995-11-06 - Re: FBI seeks huge wiretapping system

Header Data

From: hallam@w3.org
To: “James A. Donald” <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: cb6a806d33511e6992e3cb50b6e641601d2f223173eb0e596e6da749fb1eac29
Message ID: <9511061746.AA11219@zorch.w3.org>
Reply To: <199511042303.PAA29063@blob.best.net>
UTC Datetime: 1995-11-06 18:06:57 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 7 Nov 1995 02:06:57 +0800

Raw message

From: hallam@w3.org
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 1995 02:06:57 +0800
To: "James A. Donald" <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: FBI seeks huge wiretapping system
In-Reply-To: <199511042303.PAA29063@blob.best.net>
Message-ID: <9511061746.AA11219@zorch.w3.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



>This of course is the basic evil of government regulation:  Bricks are
>dangerous.  Two by fours are dangerous.  Water is dangerous.  Playgrounds
>are dangerous.  Everything is dangerous, because everything could be used 
>to cause harm, deliberately or accidentally.

You miss the central point. The NSA are simply one link in a beuracratic
chain. Their behaviour is determined by their position in that chain and
the nature of the question they are asked. If we could change the 
question they were asked from "is this dangerous" to "is this significantly
more dangerous than allowing ownership of guns" we might get somewhere.

	Phill







Thread