1995-12-20 - Re: revised time quantization package (Unix & WIN32) available

Header Data

From: Aleph One <aleph1@dfw.net>
To: N/A
Message Hash: 295e0771ad8c470e50eea61504e48b2edbe1db8859fae4c926d400a900179553
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951219193924.5644A-100000@dfw.net>
Reply To: <199512192232.WAA18554@pangaea.ang.ecafe.org>
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-20 01:49:53 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 19 Dec 95 17:49:53 PST

Raw message

From: Aleph One <aleph1@dfw.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 95 17:49:53 PST
Subject: Re: revised time quantization package (Unix & WIN32) available
In-Reply-To: <199512192232.WAA18554@pangaea.ang.ecafe.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951219193924.5644A-100000@dfw.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Tue, 19 Dec 1995, ECafe Anonymous Remailer wrote:

> I don't understand why this group continues to tolerate these blatently
> commercial messages from att (and netscape.) (The message is
> really just an ad for the cryptolib product, as it says). I've also said
> this b4 but I'll say it again: why would anyone in their right mind trust
> binary code from att after the clipper fiasco.
> 

I don't understand why this group continues to tolerate these compleatly
stupid messages from Mr. Anonymous (and other nuts.) (The message is
really just a llame by Detweller (sp?), as it indicates). I've also said
this b4 but I'll say it again: why would anyone in their right mind pay any
attention to an anonymous idiot without enough face to get a nym.

> And why do we tolerate Jeff Weinstein and Mat Blaze calling themselves
> cypherpunks, when they are so clearly just working us for their
> corporate interests? I wonder how much they get paid to monitor this
> list?
> 
> 

You might want to have a doctor help you take your head out of your ass.

Aleph One / aleph1@dfw.net
http://underground.org/
KeyID 1024/948FD6B5 
Fingerprint EE C9 E8 AA CB AF 09 61  8C 39 EA 47 A8 6A B8 01 






Thread