1995-12-08 - Re: Still more on the Digicash protocol
Header Data
From: “Rev. Mark Grant” <mark@unicorn.com>
To: David A Wagner <daw@guaymas.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
Message Hash: 4727aca3ec21701ee86434a68881bcccd998bc77e87769e71eb34d4e92dd6a73
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9512081312.A23124-0100000@unicorn.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-08 13:45:48 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 8 Dec 95 05:45:48 PST
Raw message
From: "Rev. Mark Grant" <mark@unicorn.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 95 05:45:48 PST
To: David A Wagner <daw@guaymas.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
Subject: Re: Still more on the Digicash protocol
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9512081312.A23124-0100000@unicorn.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Thu, 7 Dec 1995, David A Wagner wrote:
>Tough!? It's trivial for an active attacker, in the stream cipher case.
>He just xors some bits: no clever cryptanalysis needed. (Or did you mean
>it's tough to mount an active attack? I agree: that requires significant
>knowledge or motivation.)
Exactly.. once you have an active attack set up, it's trivial, but setting
that up is quite hard.
Mark
Thread
Return to December 1995
Return to ““Rev. Mark Grant” <mark@unicorn.com>”
1995-12-08 (Fri, 8 Dec 95 05:45:48 PST) - Re: Still more on the Digicash protocol - “Rev. Mark Grant” <mark@unicorn.com>