1995-12-04 - Re: Info on Netscape’s key escrow position

Header Data

From: “James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>
To: Jeff Weinstein <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Message Hash: 4aa4563bd4ba8787bdc4df25019adbf0d98d9823814da9c6b89aa5c411b532ef
Message ID: <199512040700.XAA14434@blob.best.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-04 07:00:08 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 3 Dec 95 23:00:08 PST

Raw message

From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 95 23:00:08 PST
To: Jeff Weinstein <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Subject: Re: Info on Netscape's key escrow position
Message-ID: <199512040700.XAA14434@blob.best.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 04:02 PM 12/2/95 -0800, Jeff Weinstein wrote:
> The whole point of our anti-GAK position is that
> government mandated key escrow is bad.

"Our" anti-GAK position.

I would like to hear Jim Clark say "GAK is bad".

I would also like to hear him, and you, refrain from using the phrase
"key escrow" and instead use the phrase "Government Access to Keys".

I draw your attention to the fact that Bill Gates did not use the 
intentionally misleading phrase "key escrow" in his book.
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
              				|  
We have the right to defend ourselves	|   http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind	|  
of animals that we are. True law	|   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the	|  
arbitrary power of the state.		|   jamesd@echeque.com






Thread