1995-12-04 - Re: Info on Netscape’s key escrow position

Header Data

From: “James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>
To: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <jsw@netscape.com
Message Hash: 54c3e36ffcc8181a6b15c86827f4ef04670b2c43256bbabaa656ae6c01ccf912
Message ID: <199512040704.XAA17057@blob.best.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-04 07:04:27 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 3 Dec 95 23:04:27 PST

Raw message

From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 95 23:04:27 PST
To: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <jsw@netscape.com
Subject: Re: Info on Netscape's key escrow position
Message-ID: <199512040704.XAA17057@blob.best.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Jeff Weinstein wrote:
> >   I don't believe that Netscape will ship a product that mandates GAK
> > unless it was required by law to do so.  As long as it is legal to sell
> > non-escrowed crypto products in this country or elsewhere, I think we
> > will keep doing it, because that is what our customers want.

E. ALLEN SMITH wrote:
	I am glad that your information leads you to this belief. However, I
> would still prefer that the official company statement include a clear section
> on this matter.

I also would like to hear this.
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
              				|  
We have the right to defend ourselves	|   http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind	|  
of animals that we are. True law	|   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the	|  
arbitrary power of the state.		|   jamesd@echeque.com






Thread