From: Andrew Loewenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 1995 13:55:41 +0800
To: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Subject: Re: e-mail forwarding, for-pay remailers
Message-ID: <9512132329.AA01184@ch1d157nwk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


E. Allen Smith writes:
>         There's one problem with this in regards to the "no necessary
>  connection," and that 's the governmental requirement for mail
>  forwarding. MBE and any legal other one will want to see at least
>  two forms of ID including one photo, and have a form that they fill
>  out using that and send to the local post office. Anyone have a
>  way around this problem?

Why does an account provider need a snail-address and phone-number?  Usually  
for billing purposes.  However, this isn't necessary for accounts paid with  
ECash.  I believe C2.org already offers non-dialup access accounts, paid for  
with ECash, that do not require a valid snail-address or phone-number.  I am  
sure that there will be many more to come.


andrew