1995-12-17 - Re: Is ths legal?.. (fwd)

Header Data

From: Jay Holovacs <holovacs@styx.ios.com>
To: cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 7f4cfe26420e5ebf87b06d9997a3c2e8feecae8949b79d553bd23df71cab9482
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9512170924.A5895-0100000@styx.ios.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-17 15:22:38 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 17 Dec 1995 23:22:38 +0800

Raw message

From: Jay Holovacs <holovacs@styx.ios.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 1995 23:22:38 +0800
To: cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: Is ths legal?.. (fwd)
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9512170924.A5895-0100000@styx.ios.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




This is the reference I couldn't find for my previous post. It would seem 
to have some relevance here

 Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 (ECPA) (18 U.S.C. ss 2510
et seq.).  "It shall not be unlawful under this chapter for an operator of
a switchboard, or an officer, employee, or agent of a provider of wire *or
electronic* communication service, whose facilities are used in the trans-
mission of a wire communication, to intercept, disclose, or use that
communication in the normal course of his employment while engaged in any
activity which is a necessary incident to the rendition of his service or
to the protection of the rights or property of the provider of that
service, except that a provider of wire communication service to the
public shall not utilize service observing or random monitoring except for
mechanical or service quality control checks."  18 USC section
2510(2)(a)(i). 

Doesn't seem to leave much room for snooping on contents of messages. 


Jay Holovacs <holovacs@ios.com>
PGP Key fingerprint =  AC 29 C8 7A E4 2D 07 27  AE CA 99 4A F6 59 87 90 
 (KEY id 1024/80E4AA05) email me for key






Thread