1995-12-15 - Re: “Strongly Voluntary” Key Escrow

Header Data

From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 904332a9bff8bcce895aed3471a40b2cda19a8072226e3c5dbe064dd2d9979c2
Message ID: <199512152102.NAA27308@netcom19.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-15 22:49:01 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 16 Dec 1995 06:49:01 +0800

Raw message

From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 1995 06:49:01 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: "Strongly Voluntary" Key Escrow
Message-ID: <199512152102.NAA27308@netcom19.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At  9:10 12/15/95 -0500, Jim Ray wrote:
>"Government Key Certification" might be an OK compromise-term compared
>to "key escrow," but we should [IMNSHO] continue to stick to "GAK." As
>you know, I prefered the term "FUCKED," but now we must be "decent" in
>our communications. <sigh>

I suggest Forced Key Deposit (FKD) (when some non-governmental entity e.g.
an employer forces you to send copies of your keys to some depository), and
Voluntary Key Deposit (VKD), when you chose to deposit a copy of your key
with some third party.  I love the way GAK sounds, so I support it even the
whole concept is really FUCKED.  Whenever I hear, "Government Key
Certification", I think of digital signatures, not communication privacy.


-----------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz                   Periwinkle  --  Computer Consulting
(408)356-8506                 16345 Englewood Ave.
frantz@netcom.com             Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA







Thread