1995-12-15 - Re: Web O Trust, active attacks against same, etc. AGAIN. (was: Usability of Cryptography (was Re: More FUD from First Virtual) )

Header Data

From: “James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>
To: bryce@colorado.edu
Message Hash: adc7d1e0f770203fc56e1a1236da52fb540631fa8d659fdbd94999ff30465b51
Message ID: <199512140616.WAA28005@blob.best.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-15 18:16:23 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 16 Dec 1995 02:16:23 +0800

Raw message

From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 1995 02:16:23 +0800
To: bryce@colorado.edu
Subject: Re: Web O Trust, active attacks against same, etc.  AGAIN.  (was: Usability of Cryptography (was Re: More FUD from First Virtual) )
Message-ID: <199512140616.WAA28005@blob.best.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 01:39 PM 12/13/95 -0700, Bryce wrote:
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> An entity calling itself "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com> 
>allegedly wrote:
>>
>> Web of trust is a mess because it attempts to link keys to 
>> physical people, which in general cannot be done.
>                   *******************************
>
>
>Do you wish to substantiate this rather brazen assertion?  
>I am very sure that PGP public key 0xCC56B2E9 belongs to my
>housemate Sebastian Kuzminsky <kuzminsk@colorado.edu>.  Is
>there some reason why I should doubt this belief?

No, but there is some reason you should gain familiarity with 
the english language

If I had intended to say "generally cannot be done"  I would have
said "generally cannot be done" instead of saying "in general cannot 
be done"



 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
              				|  
We have the right to defend ourselves	|   http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind	|  
of animals that we are. True law	|   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the	|  
arbitrary power of the state.		|   jamesd@echeque.com






Thread