cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1995-12-10 - Re: Is there a lawyer in the house?

Header Data

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
To: N/A
Message Hash: adeca43b01240d0c0de3639eaec8131b4b56f0155554572fefc825c80c8193d6
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951210024748.3597C-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
Reply To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.951210023002.18670G-100000@mercury.thepoint.net>
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-10 07:47:40 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 9 Dec 95 23:47:40 PST

Raw message

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 95 23:47:40 PST
Subject: Re: Is there a lawyer in the house?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.951210023002.18670G-100000@mercury.thepoint.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951210024748.3597C-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


 Brian Davis wrote:
> > 
> > > On Fri, 8 Dec 1995, Black Unicorn wrote:

> > You've taken the narrow answer I was trying to give out of context.
> > As for fifth amendment questions, That's another discussion entirely.  If 
> > this was not an error, then you have still taken the question way beyond the
> > narrow scope I was addressing.
> 
> You are correct:  I didn't realize/remember/whatever that you were 
> limiting the remarks to the narrow scope you set forth below.
> And on the point you were addressing, I agree with you.
> 
> Sorry to have added the fog ...

Not a problem
I could have been clearer.

> Not a lawyer on the Net, although I play one in real life.
> **********************************************************
> Flame away! I get treated worse in person every day!!

---
My prefered and soon to be permanent e-mail address: unicorn@schloss.li
"In fact, had Bancroft not existed,       potestas scientiae in usu est
Franklin might have had to invent him."    in nihilum nil posse reverti
00B9289C28DC0E55  E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information

Thread