1996-01-29 - new(?) anti-usenet censorship technique?

Header Data

From: Jon Lasser <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>
To: cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 0195713b70b124f54cfe3772faecba1af4123cb218c89561fec8f0fa70b7dd18
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960129140145.10337A-100000@rwd.goucher.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-29 20:09:54 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 04:09:54 +0800

Raw message

From: Jon Lasser <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 04:09:54 +0800
To: cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: new(?) anti-usenet censorship technique?
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960129140145.10337A-100000@rwd.goucher.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Playing around online today, it occured to me that much of Compu$pend's 
subscribers (and many other ISPs, especially smaller ones which might be 
subject to governmental pressures) rely largely on people who use chat 
modes frequently, often for sex-related chat... they cannot cut off IRC 
(for example) without hurting their income substantially.

If someone put up an IRC<->news gateway, with a bot that allowed anyone 
on channel to read newsgroups, it'd be virtually impossible to censor; 
one could use a variable channel name to increase the difficulty of 
censoring it.

Has anyone done this before? Or talked about it?
Jon Lasser
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lasser                <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>            (410)494-3072 
          Visit my home page at http://www.goucher.edu/~jlasser/
  You have a friend at the NSA: Big Brother is watching. Finger for PGP key.






Thread