1996-01-29 - Re: Netscape, CAs, and Verisign

Header Data

From: Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
To: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
Message Hash: 06e52269f94eacdfb0d1621df45691b0ac7d8577e73cbcd649a61a9b9fe2381a
Message ID: <310C6C76.AB8@netscape.com>
Reply To: <199601281901.NAA06629@proust.suba.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-29 21:19:20 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 05:19:20 +0800

Raw message

From: Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 05:19:20 +0800
To: sameer <sameer@c2.org>
Subject: Re: Netscape, CAs, and Verisign
In-Reply-To: <199601281901.NAA06629@proust.suba.com>
Message-ID: <310C6C76.AB8@netscape.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


sameer wrote:
> 
> >
> > Morevover, although I don't think it's reasonable to expect Netscape to
> > agree to include a non-existent CA in their browsers sight unseen, at the
> > same time it doesn't seem smart to sink money into setting up the CA
> > without some indication from Netscape that they're willing to give the
> > idea good faith consideration.
> >
>         They won't. You're not a megacorp in bed with RSA.

  As I said in my previous message, we don't care how big you are
as long as you meet the soon to be published criteria.

	--Jeff

PS - If you think that verisign is a megacorp, your view of the world is
     a bit skewed.

-- 
Jeff Weinstein - Electronic Munitions Specialist
Netscape Communication Corporation
jsw@netscape.com - http://home.netscape.com/people/jsw
Any opinions expressed above are mine.





Thread