1996-01-30 - Re: The Big Lie

Header Data

From: Bruce Murphy <packrat@ratbox.rattus.uwa.edu.au>
To: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
Message Hash: 1f653ec64859dfbcc331a84771dd0575c10e6eb14901ea492ee3f2784452861e
Message ID: <199601301215.UAA00311@ratbox.rattus.uwa.edu.au>
Reply To: <ukugiD96w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-30 12:49:44 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 20:49:44 +0800

Raw message

From: Bruce Murphy <packrat@ratbox.rattus.uwa.edu.au>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 20:49:44 +0800
To: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
Subject: Re: The Big Lie
In-Reply-To: <ukugiD96w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Message-ID: <199601301215.UAA00311@ratbox.rattus.uwa.edu.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


In message <ukugiD96w165w@bwalk.dm.com>, 
  Dr. Dimitri Vulis wrote:
> Bruce Murphy <packrat@ratbox.rattus.uwa.edu.au> writes:
> >
> > I was under the impression that you couldn't libel/slander a dead
> > person. Mainly because libel/slander is a offence against reputation
> > which dead people don't care much for, but also because once you go
> > against this principle where in hell (no pun intended) do you draw the
> > line.
> 
> Where it's convenient to the state. Reportedly in Germany you can easily
> slander dead people, their estates, their descendants, and other members
> of their ethnic group.

Well... how about pets then? Hitler had a pathetic goldfish!

Damn germans. I guess that they really haven't changed a hell of a lot
over the past few decades. No wonder that every other European race
(pretty much) sterotypes them.

Personally I have quite a bit of confidence that my government isn't
going to worry about encryption stuff until technology passes them
by. I am not at all unhappy about this.

--
Packrat (BSc/BE;COSO;Wombat Admin)
Nihil illegitemi carborvndvm.





Thread