1996-01-18 - Re: noise levels

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: “R. J. Harvey” <harveyrj@vt.edu>
Message Hash: 22ade058f4d09211c1ef114ab1f9c7398aff88964b55fcec856bfe8bf885404e
Message ID: <199601181547.KAA06697@jekyll.piermont.com>
Reply To: <199601181533.KAA28653@sable.cc.vt.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-18 16:43:19 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 19 Jan 1996 00:43:19 +0800

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 1996 00:43:19 +0800
To: "R. J. Harvey" <harveyrj@vt.edu>
Subject: Re: noise levels
In-Reply-To: <199601181533.KAA28653@sable.cc.vt.edu>
Message-ID: <199601181547.KAA06697@jekyll.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



"R. J. Harvey" writes:
> At 10:20 AM 1/18/96 -0500, Perry wrote:
> >
> >The noise levels around here are getting astounding.
> >
> >Posts on windows registration wizards, gun control, unemployment,
>           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>    Well, I'm sure you're correct on most of those,
> but the post on Microsoft using ENCRYPTED databases
> of competitor programs as part of its plan to surreptitiously

Actually, the database isn't encrypted -- its plaintext -- and the
wizard isn't surreptitious and tells you everything its doing and lets
you stop it if you like. In short, the topic has no cryptography
or security relevance *AT ALL*.

The posts on Microsoft's bad encryption for Windows passwords are
perfectly relevant, and I hope people don't confuse these issues.

Perry





Thread