1996-01-31 - Re: Two Bits Four Bits ETC

Header Data

From: Brian D Williams <talon57@well.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 30425e9671297f04f42419b6800b0edbe0113e519e907bdac14bf402da8f9c4c
Message ID: <199601312202.OAA12349@well.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-31 22:47:36 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 06:47:36 +0800

Raw message

From: Brian D Williams <talon57@well.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 06:47:36 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Two Bits Four Bits ETC
Message-ID: <199601312202.OAA12349@well.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



>>Brian D Williams writes:
>>Excellent point Bill! Lets not forget that IBM owns Lotus Notes,
>>be sure to include that in your bashing. They caved in on Lucifer
>>after all. ;)

>"Perry E Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> adds:
>Lucifer isn't stronger than DES, so it wasn't a cave in. An
>understanding of differential cryptanalysis makes all the
>difference...

True, I was refering to them halving the original key length.

Brian






Thread