1996-01-24 - Re: Crippled Notes export encryption

Header Data

From: David Mazieres <dm@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu>
To: Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
Message Hash: 4443d05832e39c4b9c1ba9173c8c67fbec9a1d073858f1259ca53bb1b6b5e23d
Message ID: <199601242303.SAA14589@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu>
Reply To: <2.2.32.19960123140650.00708e08@mail.interlog.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-24 23:25:17 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 25 Jan 1996 07:25:17 +0800

Raw message

From: David Mazieres <dm@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 1996 07:25:17 +0800
To: Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
Subject: Re: Crippled Notes export encryption
In-Reply-To: <2.2.32.19960123140650.00708e08@mail.interlog.com>
Message-ID: <199601242303.SAA14589@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


In article <3105FBFC.4DC9@netscape.com> Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com> writes:
>   The other way would be to export a binary with pluggable crypto,
> which is generally agreed to be regulated by the ITAR in the same
> way as software that actually contains crypto.

How did kerberos avoid this?  The "bones" distribution of kerberos
without crypto was not regulated by ITAR, right?

David






Thread