1996-01-25 - Re: Crippled Notes export encryption

Header Data

From: michael shiplett <walrus@ans.net>
To: David Mazieres <dm@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu>
Message Hash: 480eb3bdf2816f26a93210daaf9affd75bacb270b950174b0bd58c893ee399d3
Message ID: <199601242318.SAA08161@fuseki.aa.ans.net>
Reply To: <199601242303.SAA14589@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-25 00:10:51 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 25 Jan 1996 08:10:51 +0800

Raw message

From: michael shiplett <walrus@ans.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 1996 08:10:51 +0800
To: David Mazieres <dm@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: Crippled Notes export encryption
In-Reply-To: <199601242303.SAA14589@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <199601242318.SAA08161@fuseki.aa.ans.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


"dm" == David Mazieres <dm@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu> writes:

dm> How did kerberos avoid this?  The "bones" distribution of kerberos
dm> without crypto was not regulated by ITAR, right?
  In the ``bones'' version not only was the encryption code eliminated
(e.g., the functionality of libdes.a), but the hooks to call such code
disappeared as well.

michael






Thread