1996-01-11 - Re: When they came for the Jews…

Header Data

From: Jay Holovacs <holovacs@styx.ios.com>
To: Cypherpunks Mailing List <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 85882a20b2fbf838d0273bfa94292dc220e820b1d7f4d876a26641b579b6a43a
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9601110648.A23705-0100000@styx.ios.com>
Reply To: <199601102152.QAA24188@thor.cs.umass.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-11 11:18:16 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 11 Jan 1996 19:18:16 +0800

Raw message

From: Jay Holovacs <holovacs@styx.ios.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 1996 19:18:16 +0800
To: Cypherpunks Mailing List <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: When they came for the Jews...
In-Reply-To: <199601102152.QAA24188@thor.cs.umass.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9601110648.A23705-0100000@styx.ios.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


A city in Illinois (I forget the name at the moment) enacted a law 
against clothing color combinations favored by gangs. Ironically the 
local high school colors were included on the list. Things can get real 
scarey real fast. 

Jay Holovacs <holovacs@ios.com>
PGP Key fingerprint =  AC 29 C8 7A E4 2D 07 27  AE CA 99 4A F6 59 87 90 
 (KEY id 1024/80E4AA05) email me for key

On Wed, 10 Jan 1996, Futplex wrote:
> Sorry, but from where I stand there's nothing "wrong" with wearing clothing,
> bearing tattoos, etc., any more than there's anything "wrong" with having a
> particular level of skin pigmentation. When you decide that only clothing,
> tattoos, etc. that display particular colors, emblems, words, etc. are
> "wrong", then you are stifling free expression. 





Thread