1996-01-26 - 9th Circuit addresses vicarious liability

Header Data

From: Greg Broiles <gbroiles@darkwing.uoregon.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a27290be2d344dc8b1b2a432045a68905fa71befd758e76ccece78d284ee8120
Message ID: <199601260755.XAA05833@darkwing.uoregon.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-26 09:38:21 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 26 Jan 1996 17:38:21 +0800

Raw message

From: Greg Broiles <gbroiles@darkwing.uoregon.edu>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 1996 17:38:21 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: 9th Circuit addresses vicarious liability
Message-ID: <199601260755.XAA05833@darkwing.uoregon.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



The 9th Circuit issued a ruling today in _Fonovisa v. Cherry Auction_
overturning an ED CA district court's ruling re vicarious liability for
copyright and trademark infringement. If I remember correctly, the lower
court's ruling was one of those relied upon by Judge Whyte in his recent
_Netcom_ ruling. In any event, it looks like it's an important development
in vicarious liability and thus liability for ISP's and remailers and other
providers of electronic "space" or conduit.

http://www.callaw.com/9415715.html

--
"The anchored mind screwed into me by the psycho-  | Greg Broiles
lubricious thrust of heaven is the one that thinks | gbroiles@netbox.com
every temptation, every desire, every inhibition." | 
	-- Antonin Artaud		   	   | 






Thread