1996-01-09 - Re: S.652 (H.R. 1555)

Header Data

From: Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>
To: “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
Message Hash: a3f021432e8f301ebf3e3049dd4201a8b32c8370e5c908410f3c048f9d3be6c4
Message ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960109112041.14976E-100000@mercury.thepoint.net>
Reply To: <Mkwbpze00YUv81Jqs3@andrew.cmu.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-09 16:38:43 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 10 Jan 1996 00:38:43 +0800

Raw message

From: Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 1996 00:38:43 +0800
To: "Declan B. McCullagh" <declan+@CMU.EDU>
Subject: Re: S.652 (H.R. 1555)
In-Reply-To: <Mkwbpze00YUv81Jqs3@andrew.cmu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960109112041.14976E-100000@mercury.thepoint.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Tue, 9 Jan 1996, Declan B. McCullagh wrote:

> Excerpts from internet.cypherpunks: 8-Jan-96 S.652 (H.R. 1555) by Harry
> Bartholomew@netcom 
> >     Perhaps some of our more lawyerly types can decipher whether
> >     it is getting better or worse as the conference committee chews.
> >     Not I.
> 
> I'm not a lawyerly type by any means, but my understanding is that it's
> getting worse:
> 
> * The provision prohibiting the FCC from regulating the Net has been removed.
> * The max fine for "indecent" speech is now $250,000.
                                              ^^^^^^^^^

Probably accomplished by making the "crime" a felony.  Standard fine for 
Title 18 cases is $250,000 (there are exceptions, of course.

EBD





Thread