1996-01-31 - Re: Chomsky

Header Data

From: futplex@pseudonym.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Message Hash: b3bc8f4c7ac5d6714c53d4fb409a767c5af197f87208c48028cb788bb38d1e70
Message ID: <199601312105.QAA27740@opine.cs.umass.edu>
Reply To: <ad3506ce430210040bcb@[205.199.118.202]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-31 21:39:17 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 05:39:17 +0800

Raw message

From: futplex@pseudonym.com
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 05:39:17 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Subject: Re: Chomsky
In-Reply-To: <ad3506ce430210040bcb@[205.199.118.202]>
Message-ID: <199601312105.QAA27740@opine.cs.umass.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> What's the big deal about mentioning Chomsky?

huh, chomsky is just another tentacle of tcmay anyway. isn't it funny how
he talks about "manufacturing consent" as though it were some great
overwhelming evil????  he is the one who manufactures consent among the
cypherpunks!! 





Thread