1996-01-07 - Re: Revoking Old Lost Keys

Header Data

From: wlkngowl@unix.asb.com (Mutatis Mutantdis)
To: “Cypherpunks” <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: b796466c1ecde395c2656f9a57544f37a7e9cba4ddc721a71e04c684234d1b8e
Message ID: <199601070707.CAA25933@UNiX.asb.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-07 07:17:46 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 7 Jan 1996 15:17:46 +0800

Raw message

From: wlkngowl@unix.asb.com (Mutatis Mutantdis)
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 1996 15:17:46 +0800
To: "Cypherpunks" <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: Revoking Old Lost Keys
Message-ID: <199601070707.CAA25933@UNiX.asb.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Sat, 6 Jan 1996 03:10:49 +0000, "Michael C. Peponis"
<mianigand@unique.outlook.net> wrote:


>If it's widley distributed, or on a keyserver, that becomes hard.  
>First you would have to be authenticated as the origional key owner, 
>ie how do I realy know that you are you, and not somebody saying you 
>are the orgional key owner?

[..]
>Good topic. 

Interesting, yes.  Also a possible attack...

Alice sends a PGP'd message to Charlie, but gets a reply from
"Charlie" saying that they original key was lost due to a hard drive
crash, etc.... and that she should coinsider it revoked.

Is that message from Charlie or from Mallet (the demonic SysAdmin),
who is trying to get in between Alice and Charlie...?








Thread