1996-01-29 - Re: Downsizing the NSA

Header Data

From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Message Hash: b880d07ab26b8e46ab9fb24a58ecae84c04713adaa9badff02ca42d9cae2de2c
Message ID: <199601290722.CAA21466@opine.cs.umass.edu>
Reply To: <Pine.SV4.3.91.960128050809.19570B-100000@larry.infi.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-29 07:51:28 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 29 Jan 1996 15:51:28 +0800

Raw message

From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 1996 15:51:28 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Subject: Re: Downsizing the NSA
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SV4.3.91.960128050809.19570B-100000@larry.infi.net>
Message-ID: <199601290722.CAA21466@opine.cs.umass.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Tim May writes:
> AT&T is downsizing, IBM downsized a while back, so why couldn't the NSA
> just do the right thing: admit that the Soviet threat is no more,
> congratulate the victors, and downsize by 20,000 employees?

Alan Horowitz writes:
# You didn't read about it in the _Baltimore Sun_, so obviously it must not 
# have happened?

Where do you propose that these 20,000 mathematicians went?  Did they take
advantage of the unmet demand for math professors ? <snort>
Please share your evidence for this dramatic employment shift with the rest 
of us.

Futplex <futplex@pseudonym.com>





Thread