1996-01-23 - Re: You want to read MY e-mail?

Header Data

From: Alan Pugh <ampugh@mci.newscorp.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ba3ccef7c4a36f4091d3b1acf61b81592403bdae9ebbcbe3ef0561eff361199c
Message ID: <199601230748.CAA16825@kafka.delphi.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-23 07:56:06 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 22 Jan 96 23:56:06 PST

Raw message

From: Alan Pugh <ampugh@mci.newscorp.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 96 23:56:06 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: You want to read MY e-mail?
Message-ID: <199601230748.CAA16825@kafka.delphi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


=snip=
>A bill by Sen. Paul Weissmann, R-Louisville, to make e-mail as privileged as
>telephone conversations was killed in a Senate committee.
>
>A somewhat stronger bill still rests in the House.
=snip=
>Jim Carpenter, press secretary for Romer, said his office was "looking at all
>the issues, all the options."
>
>Duke said he has always complied with requests for public records, but said the
>request for e- mail messages goes too far.
>
>"I'm disturbed by it," Duke said.
>
>(John Sanko writes for the Rocky Mountain News in Denver.)
>
>   OK, if _I_ can't read your e-mail Mr. Legislator, why should you
>be able to read _mine_?

a good question. perhaps _now_ they'll get serious about recognising email
as eqivalent to postal mail. this would be an excellent way of pushing this
elsewhere. when _their_ ox is gored, they'll scream like stuck pigs. 

one interesting aspect of this would be whether regular mail is considered a
public record under the law as far as legislooters mail goes. if so, then
she should get it.

amp






Thread