1996-01-23 - Re: IPSEC == end of firewalls

Header Data

From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
To: Frank Willoughby <frankw@in.net>
Message Hash: c5039d93a9fe4ec9a3271ed4f5e93ed43894541f4db6fc5a53192913f2e56305
Message ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960123133910.8668B-100000@chivalry>
Reply To: <9601232016.AA22238@su1.in.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-23 23:29:51 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 24 Jan 1996 07:29:51 +0800

Raw message

From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 1996 07:29:51 +0800
To: Frank Willoughby <frankw@in.net>
Subject: Re: IPSEC == end of firewalls
In-Reply-To: <9601232016.AA22238@su1.in.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960123133910.8668B-100000@chivalry>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


This thread definitely belongs as cypherpunks, as the whole point of the 
discussion is to debate the limits of what cryptography on its own can 
achieve. 

What do you need as well as crypto before you can remove all firewalls?

Simon

(defun modexpt (x y n)  "computes (x^y) mod n"
  (cond ((= y 0) 1) 	((= y 1) (mod x n))
	((evenp y) (mod (expt (modexpt x (/ y 2) n) 2) n))
	(t (mod (* x (modexpt x (1- y) n)) n))))






Thread