1996-01-24 - Re: IPSEC == end of firewalls

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
Message Hash: c9eaf84b80bd787f509b764eb00539607e7c41a154e26ac3d671123bd5fd185f
Message ID: <199601240209.VAA11363@jekyll.piermont.com>
Reply To: <199601240125.RAA07818@netcom6.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-24 04:31:40 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 24 Jan 1996 12:31:40 +0800

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 1996 12:31:40 +0800
To: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
Subject: Re: IPSEC == end of firewalls
In-Reply-To: <199601240125.RAA07818@netcom6.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <199601240209.VAA11363@jekyll.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Bill Frantz writes:
> At least maybe I can avoid Perry's wrath for an off topic post :-).

Just for reference, the topic of firewalls and whether cryptographic
tools render them obsolete is not off topic for cypherpunks. In fact,
its one of the rare topics that is actually totally proper here...

.pm

Thread

• Return to January 1996

• Return to “frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)”

• Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>”

• 1996-01-24 (Wed, 24 Jan 1996 11:36:54 +0800) - Re: IPSEC == end of firewalls - frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
  • 1996-01-24 (Wed, 24 Jan 1996 12:31:40 +0800) - Re: IPSEC == end of firewalls - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>