1996-01-06 - Fwd: Undeliverable: Re: Massey, CEO of Compuserve, on Internet

Header Data

From: Steve14571@aol.com
To: goerzenj@complete.org
Message Hash: d6610a6b01af9cbab8968f1a7e52f339e407bcc33a83e653173ae1be8db28d11
Message ID: <960106095457108133691@mail04.mail.aol.com>
Reply To: _N/A

UTC Datetime: 1996-01-06 17:34:57 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 7 Jan 1996 01:34:57 +0800

Raw message

From: Steve14571@aol.com
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 1996 01:34:57 +0800
To: goerzenj@complete.org
Subject: Fwd: Undeliverable: Re: Massey, CEO of Compuserve, on Internet
Message-ID: <960106095457_108133691@mail04.mail.aol.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Something else I want to know...  Why is my mail going through microsoft.com?
---------------------
Forwarded message:
From:	postmaster@microsoft.com (Postmaster)
To:	Steve14571@aol.com (Steve14571@aol.com)
Date: 96-01-05 19:32:00 EST

Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.

      To:	goerzenj@complete.org
      Cc:	cypherpunks@toad.com
      Subject:	Re: Massey, CEO of Compuserve, on Internet
      Sent:	01/04/96 18:43:35

The following recipient(s) could not be reached:

      David Tagliani on 01/04/96 18:43:35
            The recipient name is not recognized
            [MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:northamerica:RED-70-MSG]

      Eric S. Hanson (NT RPC) on 01/04/96 18:43:35
            The recipient name is not recognized
            [MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:northamerica:RED-70-MSG]


Original Message Follows
========================


From: "Steve14571@aol.com" <Steve14571@aol.com>
To: "goerzenj@complete.org" <goerzenj@complete.org>
Cc: "cypherpunks@toad.com" <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: Massey, CEO of Compuserve, on Internet
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 1996 18:43:35 -0800

In a message dated 96-01-03 00:34:25 EST, you write:

>CompuServe is not location-dependant.  The network operates exactly the 
>same regardless of calling location (indeed, the system doesn't even know 
>where you're calling from I believe).  It is a worldwide CompuServe 
>Network that people use to access it.  This network just allows dialups 
>and then gets the users connected to the CompuServe computers.  The main 
>computers handle all traffic.  They don't are location-independant, 
>making it impossible to block access based on location.

I see two possible ways to censor German users only (but I still believe
censoring anyone is wrong).  First, the "main computers" could be told where
they are, and "censored" material could be filtered at that level before it
is sent to individual users.  Or CompuServe could release a software update
for German users.  The software would not recognize banned newsgroups.  How
difficult could that possibly be?






Thread