1996-01-25 - Re: Crippled Notes export encryption

Header Data

From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
To: David Mazieres <dm@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu>
Message Hash: e1f2a8f5f216d0951212bf892b167207c9ed16b8d06af0e9455c495b47520f3a
Message ID: <199601242330.SAA08632@toxicwaste.media.mit.edu>
Reply To: <199601242303.SAA14589@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-25 00:06:55 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 25 Jan 1996 08:06:55 +0800

Raw message

From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 1996 08:06:55 +0800
To: David Mazieres <dm@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: Crippled Notes export encryption
In-Reply-To: <199601242303.SAA14589@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <199601242330.SAA08632@toxicwaste.media.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> How did kerberos avoid this?  The "bones" distribution of kerberos
> without crypto was not regulated by ITAR, right?

Kerberos didn't leave the crypto plugable.  The bones distribution
removed not only the crypto routines but also the calls to the crypto
routines.  It would be hard to call that "pluggable".  It took a lot
of work for someone down under to replace all those crypto calls!

-derek





Thread