1996-01-14 - Re: exposure=deterence?

Header Data

From: “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: f3da22dd232ca6924ed2c27a7fe723acc9729520bf0b65aa3026a10ca1fe6ef8
Message ID: <Mky=ToC00YUv5EDHEM@andrew.cmu.edu>
Reply To: <199601140345.VAA26416@intellinet.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-14 08:10:27 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 14 Jan 1996 16:10:27 +0800

Raw message

From: "Declan B. McCullagh" <declan+@CMU.EDU>
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 1996 16:10:27 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: exposure=deterence?
In-Reply-To: <199601140345.VAA26416@intellinet.com>
Message-ID: <Mky=ToC00YUv5EDHEM@andrew.cmu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Excerpts from internet.cypherpunks: 13-Jan-96 exposure=deterence? by
Charlie Merritt@intellin 
> We need the credits now that the movie is over.
> How much money was spent?  [FOI anyone?]

If the investigation is indeed over, a FOI request is possible, no?

-Declan

Thread

• Return to January 1996

• Return to “Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>”
• Return to “cmerritt@intellinet.com (Charlie Merritt)”
• Return to ““Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>”
• Return to “Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>”
• Return to “Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>”
• Return to “s1018954@aix2.uottawa.ca”

• Return to “Scott Brickner <sjb@universe.digex.net>”

• 1996-01-14 (Sat, 13 Jan 96 19:42:10 PST) - exposure=deterence? - cmerritt@intellinet.com (Charlie Merritt)
  • 1996-01-14 (Sat, 13 Jan 96 21:04:49 PST) - Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence? - s1018954@aix2.uottawa.ca
    • 1996-01-16 (Tue, 16 Jan 1996 12:55:21 +0800) - Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence? - Scott Brickner <sjb@universe.digex.net>
      • 1996-01-16 (Tue, 16 Jan 1996 12:31:54 +0800) - Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence? - s1018954@aix2.uottawa.ca
      • 1996-01-16 (Tue, 16 Jan 1996 14:03:26 +0800) - Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence? - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
      • 1996-01-17 (Wed, 17 Jan 1996 22:17:41 +0800) - Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence? - Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>
  • 1996-01-14 (Sat, 13 Jan 96 22:22:54 PST) - Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence? - Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
  • 1996-01-14 (Sun, 14 Jan 1996 16:10:27 +0800) - Re: exposure=deterence? - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>