1996-01-18 - [noise] Re: Attack Simulator

Header Data

From: Alan Olsen <alano@teleport.com>
To: Patrick Lamb <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: fbeaf532fdadca0e28e9881aaddd3a7fd1b418b89e56ae49eea87ac7f79d8b5c
Message ID: <2.2.32.19960118205437.008885a4@mail.teleport.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-18 22:18:45 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 19 Jan 1996 06:18:45 +0800

Raw message

From: Alan Olsen <alano@teleport.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 1996 06:18:45 +0800
To: Patrick Lamb <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: [noise] Re: Attack Simulator
Message-ID: <2.2.32.19960118205437.008885a4@mail.teleport.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 02:04 PM 1/18/96 -0600, Patrick Lamb wrote:
>Is it just me, or does this sound like a commercial version of SATAN?  I
>wonder what makes SATAN unacceptable (besides the name) while something like
>this is apparently acceptable?

It is very similar, both in tests and in basic principle, to Satan.

The differences between the two are hype and Satan is free to anyone who can
figure how to make it work.  (Not always an easy task...  Especially on Linux.)

Such tools are very useful for system admin types to fix holes and for
hackers to find them. It is not the "all powerful hacker tool" the media
makes it out to be.

What this has to do with crypto, I have no idea...

Alan Olsen -- alano@teleport.com -- Contract Web Design & Instruction
        `finger -l alano@teleport.com` for PGP 2.6.2 key 
              http://www.teleport.com/~alano/ 
       "Is the operating system half NT or half full?"






Thread