1996-02-02 - Re: Telecom Bill may makes abortion talke illegal on the net…

Header Data

From: wlkngowl@unix.asb.com (Mutatis Mutantdis)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 0ea482741b0f996e61a9ad4b3208319619f037378d8b56c31c195e1280096041
Message ID: <199602020749.CAA10281@UNiX.asb.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-02 15:59:29 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 2 Feb 1996 23:59:29 +0800

Raw message

From: wlkngowl@unix.asb.com (Mutatis Mutantdis)
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 1996 23:59:29 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Telecom Bill may makes abortion talke illegal on the net...
Message-ID: <199602020749.CAA10281@UNiX.asb.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@Glue.umd.edu> wrote:

>Sec. 507 of the Telecom Bill Ammends Section 1462 of title 18 of the U.S. 
>Code (Chapter 71), in ways which may make sending the following over the 
>Internet illegal:

[..]
> o any information telling about how to obtain or make abortions and 
>   drugs, or obtaining or making anything that is for indecent or immoral 
    ^^^^^
>   use

So the PharmWeb and any discussion of pharamacology would be illegal?
Or does that soley apply to abortion drugs?  Immoral is a pretty vague
word legally...

[..]
        
>        (a) any obscene, lewd, lascivious, or filthy book, pamphlet, picture,
>motion-picture film, paper, letter, writing, print, or other matter of
>indecent character; or

So much for good foreign films...

>        (b) any obscene, lewd, lascivious, or filthy phonograph recording,
>electrical transcription, or other article or thing capable of producing
>sound; or

Whoopie cuishins would be illegal.

[..]








Thread