1996-02-16 - Re: A Cyberspace Independence Refutation

Header Data

From: Sten Drescher <stend@grendel.texas.net>
To: jamesd@echeque.com
Message Hash: 16067d37286229e8baf92c331b6dc7eabfe3f444a2195225be69bbfac0947ebb
Message ID: <199602161957.NAA02481@grendel.texas.net>
Reply To: <199602161631.IAA25897@news1.best.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-16 23:41:16 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 07:41:16 +0800

Raw message

From: Sten Drescher <stend@grendel.texas.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 07:41:16 +0800
To: jamesd@echeque.com
Subject: Re: A Cyberspace Independence Refutation
In-Reply-To: <199602161631.IAA25897@news1.best.com>
Message-ID: <199602161957.NAA02481@grendel.texas.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


jamesd@echeque.com said:

j> 1.  President Clinton declared CDA unconstitutional and directed
j> the Justice department to refrain from enforcing it.

	Then why is the Justice Department defending it?  Sorry, but
unless you can give us a citation, I can't buy this one.  I believe
that Clinton did, however, direct the Justice Department to not
enforce the abortion gag rule that got tacked on at the very end, so
maybe that's what you are thinking of.  But that wasn't part of the
CDA.

-- 
#include <disclaimer.h>                               /* Sten Drescher */
Unsolicited email advertisements will be proofread for a US$100/page fee.





Thread