1996-02-16 - Re: [NOISE] Patents and Trademarks invalid

Header Data

From: lmccarth@cs.umass.edu
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Message Hash: 1a89c8fdbfd353ddbee3314c26be022c7365ca6d605bad505e02667a1ab15163
Message ID: <199602161118.GAA10682@opine.cs.umass.edu>
Reply To: <El96Bru00iWU80irw4@andrew.cmu.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-16 12:13:14 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 20:13:14 +0800

Raw message

From: lmccarth@cs.umass.edu
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 20:13:14 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Subject: Re: [NOISE] Patents and Trademarks invalid
In-Reply-To: <El96Bru00iWU80irw4@andrew.cmu.edu>
Message-ID: <199602161118.GAA10682@opine.cs.umass.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Zachary Amsden writes:
> (please don't e-mail me about this - I have enough e-mail already.  
> Post instead)

I'm confused. Instead of you alone getting a copy of every reply, you'd
prefer the scenario where you get a copy of every reply, and so does 
everyone else on the cypherpunks list, because _you_ get too much mail ?
How does this scheme reduce the amount of email you get ?  Are you not in
fact subscribed to cypherpunks ?

(I have no objection to everyone replying to the list; I just don't
understand how this eases the burden on ZA's mailbox.)

-Lewis	"You're always disappointed, nothing seems to keep you high -- drive 
	your bargains, push your papers, win your medals, fuck your strangers;
	don't it leave you on the empty side ?"  (Joni Mitchell, 1972)





Thread