1996-02-22 - No Subject

Header Data

From: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
To: N/A
Message Hash: 1c7f0ad2ab7ecbaac98042dedffc9069dd8602c69ee04f058a2c91d8e0d72a6a
Message ID: <QQadzy29206.199602221131@relay3.UU.NET>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-22 11:35:56 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 19:35:56 +0800

Raw message

From: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 19:35:56 +0800
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <QQadzy29206.199602221131@relay3.UU.NET>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


IPG Sales <ipgsales@cyberstation.net> wrote:

>  See my reply to Tim Phillip - it is checked extensively 
> 
> If the algorithm sucks, prove it - please read the messages back and 

See my comment below.
[..]
> > [..]
> > > In general, you will find the kernel of the propgations consists of 64
> > > equation sets of the form:
> > > 
> > >        Bi=(Bi+Ci MOD Di) Mod 256             Large prime numbers
> > >        ENCRYPTEXTi=OTP[Bi] XOR PLAINTEXTi    Encryption
> > >        OTP[Bi]=ENCRYPTEXTi                   Makes the OTP Dynamic
> > 
> > Bah. Looks to me like simple garbling, only using a large stream.
> > 
> > Encrypt a stream of zeros with that method, and you'll get repeated
> > strings of OTP[Bi]'s.  An unsophisticated high school student could
> > crack that.


 





Thread