cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1996-02-20 - Re: should we use same nym on multiple servers?

Header Data

From: John Perry <perry@vishnu.alias.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 39a3b1136ee4e0c98d1493d82d6f2d0ef98d8384586df71c421b8db3f6a46dbe
Message ID: <199602201238.GAA18210@vishnu.alias.net>
Reply To: <199602200645.HAA00901@utopia.hacktic.nl>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-20 13:08:53 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 21:08:53 +0800

Raw message

From: John Perry <perry@vishnu.alias.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 21:08:53 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: should we use same nym on multiple servers?
In-Reply-To: <199602200645.HAA00901@utopia.hacktic.nl>
Message-ID: <199602201238.GAA18210@vishnu.alias.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>>>>> "Anonymous" == Anonymous  <nobody@REPLAY.COM> writes:


    Anonymous> harder to keep our real ID secret.  (E.g., an
    Anonymous> oversimplified scenario would be if an attacker sends a
    Anonymous> message to all three nyms, then watches three PGP
    Anonymous> conventionally encrypted messages arrive in our
    Anonymous> mailbox.)

	What's wrong with having a nym point to yet another nym on a
different server? Has anyone thought of that?

Thread