1996-02-18 - Re: A Cyberspace Independence Refutation

Header Data

From: jamesd@echeque.com
To: Sten Drescher <stend@grendel.texas.net>
Message Hash: 409c994dc11dcc31d33da0c9c77434915c6bfadbfd96ed293f2b822f850fd638
Message ID: <199602172323.PAA01754@blob.best.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-18 00:05:27 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 18 Feb 1996 08:05:27 +0800

Raw message

From: jamesd@echeque.com
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 1996 08:05:27 +0800
To: Sten Drescher <stend@grendel.texas.net>
Subject: Re: A Cyberspace Independence Refutation
Message-ID: <199602172323.PAA01754@blob.best.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


jamesd@echeque.com said:
>
>j> 1.  President Clinton declared CDA unconstitutional and directed
>j> the Justice department to refrain from enforcing it.

At 01:57 PM 2/16/96 -0600, Sten Drescher wrote:
>	Then why is the Justice Department defending it? 

Sorry:  My error.  As you pointed out he ruled *part* of the
CDA unconstitutional -- a part that no one expected to be
enforced anyway
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
              				|  
We have the right to defend ourselves	|   http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind	|  
of animals that we are. True law	|   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the	|  
arbitrary power of the state.		|   jamesd@echeque.com






Thread