From: "Blake Ramsdell" <Blaker@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 15:31:47 +0800
To: BKnowles@aol.net
Subject: RE: RE: [ Death of MOSS? ]
Message-ID: <UPMAIL01.199602280716350827@msn.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Brad Knowles said:
>     Obviously a few additional enhancements would be necessary, such
> as cryptographic signatures on return receipts and classification
> labels (as two examples, there may be more), but MOSS is my current
> best yardstick for measuring just how well a secure email standard
> really is integrated into MIME, with the absolute minimal amount of
> disturbance to the existing MIME standard (and thus, making it the
> most "native" MIME implementation of a secure email standard).

Both the PGP and S/MIME specifications propose the use of security multiparts 
-- how come these don't rank as highly as MOSS in your view of how well they 
are integrated with MIME?

Blake