1996-02-16 - Re: Some thoughts on the Chinese Net

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: Jon Lasser <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>
Message Hash: 5533a740cac2ebc12b5d7de187f6d568f20418d0a8903b16c1dfd24dca89996f
Message ID: <199602142238.RAA24705@jekyll.piermont.com>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960214163300.4373A-100000@rwd.goucher.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-16 13:43:46 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 21:43:46 +0800

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 21:43:46 +0800
To: Jon Lasser <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on the Chinese Net
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960214163300.4373A-100000@rwd.goucher.edu>
Message-ID: <199602142238.RAA24705@jekyll.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Jon Lasser writes:
> The more complex portion (from my perspective, at any rate) is a 
> modification of the standard TCP/IP protocol, requiring that each packet 
> be signed by its originating user. This would require lots of software 
> modification on the Chinese end, as well as a conversion process at the 
> National firewall.

They could use no stock software, and they would grind every machine
in the country to its knees doing the signatures. RSA signatures
aren't cheap.

Furthermore, you couldn't check the signatures at the other end fast
enough and it would probably be easy enough to steal keys. I doubt
this would fix their problem.

Perry





Thread