1996-02-07 - Re: Assassination Politics–isn’t it gambling?

Header Data

From: banelaw@med.com
To: cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 6761a3cd001e9f139750a69c182613f40ea3f1fdd81589144bb28f360d0ffd8b
Message ID: <9602070200.AA26022@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-07 17:37:32 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 8 Feb 1996 01:37:32 +0800

Raw message

From: banelaw@med.com
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 1996 01:37:32 +0800
To: cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: Assassination Politics--isn't it gambling?
Message-ID: <9602070200.AA26022@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Jim: as to "Assassination Politics."  Isn't the structure you describe
gambling?  Placing money on a prediction, with the correct predictor
winning?  And if so, isn't it illegal if done over the wires, i.e., federal
commerce?  I'm not looking for a way to declare your scheme illegal, I'm
just pointing out that there are other angles, especially if done over the
wires. I guess you could move the structure off shore--pity the poor country
hosting such an entity!  If you were at all succesfull, the server accepting
digital cash would be moving from place to place--remember pirate radio?

Philip
BaneLaw
Suite 210W
1800 112th Ave NE
Bellevue, WA 98004
206.455.5537
Fax:206.812.2032






Thread