1996-02-07 - Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd)

Header Data

From: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
To: ravage@ssz.com
Message Hash: 75bd1db5fa7b2f9d9f31bc4c75332b3ca9b1bba428d1af314fc6c996f35f0cd4
Message ID: <01I0WP5CYZQ0A0UW73@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-07 20:36:37 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 8 Feb 1996 04:36:37 +0800

Raw message

From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 1996 04:36:37 +0800
To: ravage@ssz.com
Subject: Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd)
Message-ID: <01I0WP5CYZQ0A0UW73@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


From:	IN%"ravage@ssz.com"  "Jim Choate"  6-FEB-1996 21:15:10.47

>If the intent is to motivate others to kill or otherwise harm others simply
because you don't agree with them or their actions is reprehensible and
moraly or ethicaly undefensible.
-------------------
	So you don't believe in self-defense, or the defense of another? While
I'm not as sure as Jim whether such a system would just be used by the good
guys, if someone has taken action to seriously violate the rights of another
I can see the death penalty as being appropriate.
	-Allen





Thread