1996-02-15 - Re: fortune and predictions…

Header Data

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: jf_avon@citenet.net (Jean-Francois Avon (JFA Technologies, QC, Canada))
Message Hash: 808b0ae6a7625bd62dd9b634e9d207d89db7a8c1b33a1857e819f5b8502707ca
Message ID: <m0tmz8s-00091XC@pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-15 14:40:42 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 22:40:42 +0800

Raw message

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 22:40:42 +0800
To: jf_avon@citenet.net (Jean-Francois Avon (JFA Technologies, QC, Canada))
Subject: Re: fortune and predictions...
Message-ID: <m0tmz8s-00091XC@pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 08:55 PM 2/14/96 -0500, Jean-Francois Avon (JFA Technologies, QC, Canada)
wrote:
>GREETINGS!
>
>>(BTW, why don't you  respond to the list?)
>
>Actually, I just did.  I was tempted to mail the stuff directly to you but
then,
>I realised that you might have interpreted what I said as a threat. 

Huh? I didn't even notice.   Well, I guess after a few months of promoting
"Assassination Politics", I'm so thick-skinned that nothing fazes me anymore.

>So I posted it
>publicly. (Isn't CPunks about being untrustfull... :)

The reason I'd prefer most of the discussion on the list is simple:  I have
a limited amount of time, and I'm promoting an idea.  If you have a good
argument that I should be able to address, I want everyone to have the
benefit not only of your comment but also my response!


>I brought an argument in my post.  I could develop it further on private
e-mail with you.

I'll read it.  However, my mail has slowed to a trickle today.  There's
something wrong, somewhere.  It'll come flooding in, in a few hours I'll bet.


>You will certainly understand my argument.  I'd be delighted if you can
prove me wrong.

We shall see...






Thread