1996-02-29 - Re: ViaCryptPGP 4.0?! (was Re: PGP integrated into Z-Mail)

Header Data

From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
To: “Deranged Mutant” <WlkngOwl@UNiX.asb.com>
Message Hash: a08461cf1aa1afcce6c3305c975ca7e85d2082a584c112b4b851fdec30ba02b5
Message ID: <199602282242.RAA18760@toxicwaste.media.mit.edu>
Reply To: <199602282222.RAA15759@UNiX.asb.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-29 00:00:30 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 08:00:30 +0800

Raw message

From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 08:00:30 +0800
To: "Deranged Mutant" <WlkngOwl@UNiX.asb.com>
Subject: Re: ViaCryptPGP 4.0?! (was Re: PGP integrated into Z-Mail)
In-Reply-To: <199602282222.RAA15759@UNiX.asb.com>
Message-ID: <199602282242.RAA18760@toxicwaste.media.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> I would have thought you and Colin would have some communication with 
> Phil regarding PGP3, since PGP is his trademark.

Colin and I have been speaking to Phil.  That doesn't mean that I have
any idea what ViaCrypt is doing.  Perhaps Phil and ViaCrypt should
talk?  If there is a problem with ViaCrypt 4.0, it is between Phil and
ViaCrypt.

> The web page referred to it as being in beta, so maybe they are 
> working with the old specs... could also be that they completely 
> rewrote and improved on the old version.

I have nothing to do with ViaCrypt.  I dont know anything about their
products.  I don't know what they have or plan to have in their 4.0
version.  I dont know what spec they are using.  I dont know what new
data structures they have created.

-derek





Thread