1996-02-19 - Re:

Header Data

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: acg@mandrake.cen.ufl.edu (Alexandra Griffin)
Message Hash: aa376ba18bab60679795bb2f7e820be0ce167d7786c40d3fc4357f3473bef059
Message ID: <m0toNKI-0008zmC@pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-19 05:21:49 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 13:21:49 +0800

Raw message

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 13:21:49 +0800
To: acg@mandrake.cen.ufl.edu (Alexandra Griffin)
Subject: Re:
Message-ID: <m0toNKI-0008zmC@pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

At 08:13 PM 2/18/96 -0500, Dave Emery wrote:
>
>> 
>> Bob writes:
>> 
>> > Does anyone know if the new in-line optical amplifiers (not switches!) have
>> > any effect on quantum crypto messages?
>
>  Optical
>> repeaters have to pass your signal through an intermediate electronic
>> stage anyway, since we have no purely optical valve/transistor
>> equivalents (bosons don't interact with each other at all).
>
>	This is not true.   There is now a whole technology of optical
>amplifiers for fiber communications systems that used Ettrium doped
>fibers pumped

The proper name is "Erbium."  But the rest of Dave Emery's commentary is
accurate.

Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com

Klaatu Burada Nikto

Something is going to happen.    Something.....Wonderful!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBMSfqOPqHVDBboB2dAQH9vgP/X8sK3BdAwqf3clXxP31DZJqH6xLjMX3l
UxZSDsLOJ7MRrkJ3h2WV+cBXtu6ZA/zOOjmjh+o+U+b4rEPQrVWfj10LyV5uYC7l
Du9Sq6S3/qD9MVJLG5dTB3rnaLRh0alBWInyJBIJZz2Y7cjHJ+LCu7u++u39uLzv
V5WV2DSdWW8=
=QJ7q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






Thread