1996-02-14 - PING packets illegal?

Header Data

From: anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: c17e544c803184285c6bae12ff1d33f906351db86572c5e787c2449a6ddb3c37
Message ID: <199602140355.TAA08824@jobe.shell.portal.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-14 09:56:32 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 17:56:32 +0800

Raw message

From: anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 1996 17:56:32 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: PING packets illegal?
Message-ID: <199602140355.TAA08824@jobe.shell.portal.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Concerning the ITAR ...... what would happen if some Evil Hacker Dude in,
say, England, decided to ICMP-ping a host in America? Nothing wrong with
that ...... but if those ping packets contained little pieces of something
like PGP ...... would the host being pinged be breaking the law? Would
all the hosts in the route between that host and the host in England that
was doing the ping also be breaking the law?

Curious,

Michael Ellis
<mellis@alpha.c2.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBMSE1owqs/Oe38tFJAQEiVgP+M10Cjf1mCq8L9uAfaxHV/hYpDUSJ5FMA
8j7nYyi4hH8heAak7l2AJXeSyqY1nMexBMoeZnUPbCRiZmrk7h9SSjywXIhV4ITH
y6z70NKhoz3p0d3kSeBiPiMuHuz1HAI/5hrECAqY9f+R0kYkK3GvVitb405Ly7kn
J0gbHi7pQOA=
=NcP+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----







Thread