1996-02-01 - RE: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit Cards

Header Data

From: David Mazieres <dm@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu>
To: David Van Wie <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: d4a9050abd0786d2bea3d985816af894526edd17c213c8b3f5d69a3ac1be0544
Message ID: <199602010938.EAA20003@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu>
Reply To: <310E7DAE@hamachi>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-01 14:18:44 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 22:18:44 +0800

Raw message

From: David Mazieres <dm@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 1996 22:18:44 +0800
To: David Van Wie <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: RE: FV Demonstrates Fatal Flaw in Software Encryption of Credit Cards
In-Reply-To: <310E7DAE@hamachi>
Message-ID: <199602010938.EAA20003@amsterdam.lcs.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> Changing the subject doesn't change the point.  Your announcement implies   
> that users are liable, and that is incorrect.  This is misleading, and in   
> my view, reprehensible.  This was the point of my post.  The fact that   
> the fraud is traceable when detected should have been self evident.

I think there is an even stronger point to be made.  We can be
relatively sure that VISA is not going to go out of business any time
soon.  On the other hand, if an E-mail intercepting virus lost FV tons
of money, FV might conceivably go belly up sticking their customers
with the bill.  With FV, there might indeed be a risk to the user.

David





Thread