1996-02-23 - Re: Internet Privacy Guaranteed ad (POTP Jr.)

Header Data

From: geeman@best.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: df5f7267514bcc954386b03483305bc494344c27b1d1c843f971cc53e3a2a21e
Message ID: <199602231635.IAA22733@mail1.best.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-23 17:28:03 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 24 Feb 1996 01:28:03 +0800

Raw message

From: geeman@best.com
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 1996 01:28:03 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Internet Privacy Guaranteed ad (POTP Jr.)
Message-ID: <199602231635.IAA22733@mail1.best.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 08:56:13
>To: cypherpunks@Toad.com
>From: geeman@best.com
>Subject: Re: Internet Privacy Guaranteed ad (POTP Jr.)
>
>
> IDG: Get real.  Publish the stuff like the rest of the world does.  The
only ones who don't are just not players in the game.  If you want to try to
snow consumer-types then go ahead.  But if you want validation from the
crypto community you'll have to just publish it. 
>
>And if you don't, and just continue the marketing fluff, then people from
this list, and others in the community, will be all over you and the
publications (lists, press, etc) with the theoretical and inferred
weaknesses of your system. 
>
>I would say the onus is on you to put up or shut up and don't try to
orchestrate or control the parameters of the disclosure.  It's really in
your own interests, I would think.
>
>






Thread