1996-02-11 - Re: Regarding employee rights on company equipment

Header Data

From: Leslie Todd Masco <cactus@hks.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: f28a2a0f08ae28d4e7e644c11fa0c09acfcdc1833e67a6a924983151ce8c5979
Message ID: <199602100034.TAA06923@bb.hks.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-11 04:44:09 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 11 Feb 1996 12:44:09 +0800

Raw message

From: Leslie Todd Masco <cactus@hks.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 1996 12:44:09 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Regarding employee rights on company equipment
Message-ID: <199602100034.TAA06923@bb.hks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

> From Edupage Feb 8, 1996,
> 
> INTERNET USAGE POLICIES
> Neal J. Friedman, a specialist in online computer law, says that "employees
> are under the misapprehension that the First Amendment applies in the
> workplace --  it doesn't. 

Friedman is only pseudo-right: IE, his arguement makes sense but courts have not
always followed this reasoning, though: if you're really interested in this topic,
investigate rulings where an employer has read an employee's voicemail.

The key concept is "reasonable expectation of privacy."
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service.  A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service

iQBFAwUBMRvoHSoZzwIn1bdtAQGA5AF+NLNypUxQ1E5/X6smpiY215d2R1O0A/Y0
n0hlXF9lpZNg6y+qlLWR5qZc00PZ5HpX
=NI4R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread