1996-03-14 - Re: How’s that again?
Header Data
From: Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>
To: jimbell@pacifier.com (jim bell)
Message Hash: 0337d2fc5cd3f9687bad38b53655ddbddc0b025463c13d4e4df48fe0fb29cea6
Message ID: <199603131503.KAA10011@homeport.org>
Reply To: <m0twag5-0008xXC@pacifier.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-14 03:37:54 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 11:37:54 +0800
Raw message
From: Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 11:37:54 +0800
To: jimbell@pacifier.com (jim bell)
Subject: Re: How's that again?
In-Reply-To: <m0twag5-0008xXC@pacifier.com>
Message-ID: <199603131503.KAA10011@homeport.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
jim bell wrote:
| I think this is an exaggeration... I"ve been told that this list goes to
| over a thousand addresses. Weighted only among those who choose to post (a
| self-selected group, obviously), I do raise some heat, but it isn't clear
| that "most" or even a large minority of the list disagree with my
I disagree with your thoughts, and find you annoying and
unwilling to answer substantitive questions raised about your plans.
Furthermore, most of your posts are way too long.
Adam
--
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
-Hume
Thread
Return to March 1996
- Return to “Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>”
- Return to “Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>”
- Return to “jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>”
Return to “Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>”
- 1996-03-13 (Wed, 13 Mar 1996 20:09:29 +0800) - How’s that again? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
- 1996-03-13 (Wed, 13 Mar 1996 12:21:50 +0800) - Re: How’s that again? - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
- 1996-03-13 (Wed, 13 Mar 1996 22:08:01 +0800) - Re: How’s that again? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
- 1996-03-14 (Thu, 14 Mar 1996 11:37:54 +0800) - Re: How’s that again? - Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>