1996-03-08 - Re: SEAL cipher info requested (something actually list related!)

Header Data

From: Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>
To: ChristopherA@consensus.com (Christopher Allen)
Message Hash: 09c99c6260713e82d0ecb6fbe3f2127630f3fd012028e1699b67c63a39298b01
Message ID: <199603060521.AAA15746@homeport.org>
Reply To: <v03005302ad621f89a608@[157.22.240.192]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-08 00:25:30 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 8 Mar 1996 08:25:30 +0800

Raw message

From: Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 1996 08:25:30 +0800
To: ChristopherA@consensus.com (Christopher Allen)
Subject: Re: SEAL cipher info requested (something actually list related!)
In-Reply-To: <v03005302ad621f89a608@[157.22.240.192]>
Message-ID: <199603060521.AAA15746@homeport.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


Christopher Allen wrote:

|   * are there are any links on the web to SEAL?

Ask Altavista.

|   * is IBM actively marketing it?

See above.  If you can't find it on the web, they're not actively
marketing it. :)

|   * what precisely is patent?
|   * for how long?
|   * has anyone currently licensed it?
|   * has anyone tried attacking the algorithm?
|   * should we be (the community) be looking at SEAL
|     for standards (say as an alternative to RC4?)?
|   * is there something better then SEAL available?

	How about Blowfish?

Adam


-- 
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
					               -Hume






Thread